Ina Jarve, Natalja Liba, Marian Rand, Jaano Berg-Jurgens
Software automation impact on aerial
triangulation accuracy and geometric quality of orthophoto mosaic based on UltraCAM D sample images
Conference Information: |
9th International Conference “Environmental Engineering”, 22–23 May 2014, Vilnius, LITHUANIA |
Source: |
ICEE-2014 - International Conference on Environmental
Engineering |
Book Series: |
International Conference on Environmental Engineering
(ICEE) Selected papers |
ISSN: |
eISSN 2029-7092 online |
ISBN: |
eISBN 978-609-457-640-9 |
ISBN: |
ISBN 978-609-457-690-4 CD |
Year: |
2014 |
Publisher: |
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Press Technika |
View full text in PDF format
Abstract
The current developments in photogrammetry
software enable to obtain more detailed and higher
resolution photoproducts in a shorter period of time.
In addition to that, digital orthophoto production has
become more automated, making the operator’s task
relatively easy. The present research investigates
to which extent software automation affects the
accuracy of aerial triangulation and geometric quality
of orthophoto mosaic based on digital frame aerial
camera UltraCAM D images. For this purpose, two
separate projects were carried out: the first project
examined the accuracy of aerial triangulation (AT)
and the second one the geometric quality of the mosaic.
The first Project involved making two photo blocks:
one with automatic and another with manual AT. In the
second project, 3 orthophoto mosaics were made: one with
fully automated processing steps for orthophoto production,
the second with semi-automated steps with automatic AT and
DEM correction, and the third one with manual steps.
The Mean Root Square Error (RMS) quality of both projects
was analyzed using ground control points.
Both photo blocks of the first project didn’t exceed the permitted size
(RMS ? 0.45 m). The geometric accuracy of the manual AT was 0.094 m a
nd that of the automatic AT was 0.415 m. The analysis of the geometric
quality of the mosaics (second project) showed that geometrically the
most accurate is the mosaic made with manual processing steps.
The RMS was 0.308 m. The RMS of the semiautomatic mosaic was 0.335 m.
The full-automatic mosaic was not within the permitted size: its RMS was 1.805.
Keywords: UltraCAM D; orthophoto mosaic;
aerial triangulation; digital elevation model; geometrical quality.
|